token Smart Contract audit report
Contract: ATC token Address: 0x511770EDA821Dd26F50d3be4572320e4822110f1 Date: March 03, 2025Security Findings
Centralized Supply Control
Severity: Low
Description: The entire initial supply is minted to the deployer (msg.sender) during construction.
Risk: While this centralizes the token initially, it’s a common deployment pattern and poses no immediate security threat if the deployer is trusted (e.g., a team wallet). No vulnerabilities exist in the code itself.
Lack of Supply Cap
Severity: Low
Description: No maximum supply is enforced beyond the initial mint, but no additional minting functions are present.
Risk: Since the contract cannot mint more tokens post-deployment, this is a design choice rather than a vulnerability. Future changes would require a new contract, posing no current risk.
Gas Optimization Opportunity
Severity: Low
Description: The calculation initialSupply * 10**decimals() occurs on-chain during deployment.
Risk: Slightly higher gas cost during deployment is negligible and does not impact security or runtime performance.
Documentation Deficiency
Severity: Low
Description: The contract lacks NatSpec comments or detailed documentation.
Risk: This affects readability but introduces no functional or security risks to the contract’s operation.
General Security
Severity: None
Description: The contract inherits from OpenZeppelin’s ERC-20 library and uses Solidity ^0.8.0, eliminating risks like reentrancy, integer overflows, or standard noncompliance. No critical or exploitable vulnerabilities are present.
ConclusionThe MyToken contract is secure with no high or medium-severity risks identified. All potential concerns are classified as low severity, reflecting minor design considerations rather than exploitable flaws. The contract is robust for its intended purpose within the Aivatic ecosystem, leveraging trusted libraries and safe coding practices.Status: Secure with Minimal Risks
Last updated